Category: Murder/Homicide

The homicide rate in the areas served by the Los Angeles County Sheriff’s Department dropped to 0.61 deaths per 10,000 residents in 2010, the lowest it has been since 1965, according to data recently released by the Sheriff’s Department. The numbers are taken from the entire area served by the Los Angeles Sheriff’s Department. In order to be included as a “homicide,” a crime had to involve the killing of one person by another, whether intentional or accidental.

In total, 181 homicides occurred in Los Angeles County in 2010, the lowest number in any one year since 1971. Overall, since 1960, the year with the fewest total homicides was 1972, with 146 deaths. The year that saw the most homicides was 1995, when 473 lives were lost.

Although a few years since 1960 have seen fewer total homicides than 2010, the rate of homicides – or the number of deaths divided by the total number of people in the area – was at a historic low in 2010. The rate of 0.61 deaths per 10,000 people in 2010 is similar to the rates of the early 1970s and is much lower than the rates in the mid-1990s, when rates of 1.5 homicides per 10,000 people were not uncommon.

Every type of homicide charge carries serious penalties if the charged person is convicted. If you have been charged with murder, manslaughter, or a similar crime in California, experienced Los Angeles homicide defense lawyer Lawrence Wolf has the experience to provide an aggressive defense that protects your legal rights and fight for the best possible outcome in your case. For a free and confidential consultation, call the Law Offices of Lawrence Wolf today at [number type=”1″].

Tragically, a five-year-old boy was gunned down in an alleged gang attack while getting ready to go trick-or-treating, according to The Los Angeles Times.

The young boy was posing in a Spiderman costume in his backyard in Los Angeles. The attack is suspected of being misdirected gunfire between the Crips and the Bloods, two notorious rival Los Angeles gangs. The young boy was hit in the head with a stray bullet and died immediately. Although the boy’s house is in the middle of an area notorious for gangs, no one in his family is connected to a gang.

Along with the shooting of the young boy, his uncle was hit in the wrist and his grandfather was hit in the leg. The young boy was the 32nd person killed within a 12 square mile radius that is one of the most dangerous areas in Los Angeles. Typically, children are not targeted by gangs, although children are sometimes hit by stray bullets.

In prior years, a killing such as this one would have resulted in many more revenge killings. Now, however, gang interventionists are paid by the city to work the streets in order to stop retaliations. Residents in the area immediately provided details about the killing to police, who arrested two alleged members of the Kitchen Crips gang.

Individuals involved in a gang are often viewed as guilty until proven innocent. If you have been charged with a violent crime in relation to alleged gang activity, contact our experienced Los Angeles murder defense attorneys at the Law Offices of Lawrence Wolf. For a free consultation, call us at [number type=”1″].

The recent arrest of the “Grim Sleeper” killer has shined a light on California’s policy of allowing familial DNA searches, according to the New York Times. Familial DNA searches are the use of DNA samples from convicts to find relatives who may have committed a crime.

Only California and Colorado have written policies allowing familial DNA searches, although the technique is commonly used in England. Earlier this summer, the L.A.P.D. used a familial DNA search to find the “Grim Sleeper” killer, who is accused of having killed at least 10 victims in the L.A. area over 25 years. In their attempt to solve the crime, California’s DNA lab analyzed old crime scene evidence and found a link between the evidence and the killer’s son, who was convicted of a felony and had his DNA in the state database. The police then followed the suspect and nabbed his DNA from a pizza slice he threw away. This represents the first time that familial DNA has been used in a murder case in the U.S.

Although many in the police community are hailing the use of familial DNA to solve cases, there are many criticisms of the technique. Critics claim it is imprecise and has the potential to invade individuals’ privacy. They also claim it is a type of racial profiling because a higher percentage of inmates are minorities. Also, although California restricts the use of familial DNA searching to major, violent crimes, critics worry that other states may use the technique for other crimes as well.

Have you or a loved one been accused of a violent crime in Los Angeles based on DNA evidence? If so, contact the experienced Los Angeles murder defense attorneys at the Law Offices of Lawrence Wolf. Our legal team will analyze all the evidence and work hard to provide you with the best possible defense for your case. Contact us today at [number type=”1″].

Lonnie Franklin Jr. was arrested in Los Angeles on July 7 on suspicion of being the “Grim Sleeper” killer. In the 1980’s, a series of killings of young black women occurred and then stopped, resuming 14 years later, which inspired the name Grim Sleeper.

Lonnie Franklin was charged with 10 counts of murder, as well as other charges, reports anABC News article. Franklin was arrested 15 times over the past several decades for burglary, car theft, gun possession and assault. However, he was never entered into California’s DNA database because his crimes were not serious enough.

Despite all his arrests, Franklin’s DNA was never entered into a DNA database. His last conviction occurred one year before all felony convicts in California were required to have their DNA placed in a state database.

Franklin was discovered by authorities using a familial DNA match. In June, the California Department of Justice ran DNA from the case through a database. The database failed to find any matches, but it did find a familial match, which means that a different convicted felon’s DNA showed that he was a brother or a son of the Grim Sleeper killer. Detectives used that information to locate Franklin.

The circumstances surrounding Michael Jackson’s death may have cleared up over the last few months, but details surrounding criminal charges are still being determined. Reportedly, decisions regarding criminal charges connected to the pop singer’s death will not be made before 2010. According to the Los Angeles Times, the evidence involved in the case, much of which is complicated medical data, is so extensive that outside medical experts have been called in to help determine the scope of negligent action that played a role in Jackson’s death.

Jackson died on June 25th, the official cause determined to have been “acute propfol intoxication.” Dr. Conrad Murray, Jackson’s personal physician, remains the primary suspect. While specific charges are still pending, manslaughter is one charge that will certainly be sought in connection to the death. Ultimately, this case is emblematic of the careful examination that should accompany all criminal investigations. Regardless of the circumstances or the scope of the investigation, every detail should be thoroughly examined to ensure that all available information is present during the trial process.