Law & Information

Slight Rise in 2008 Santa Clarita Hate Crimes

In 2008, the number of hate crimes nationwide dropped. However, the Santa Clarita Valley actually experienced a slight increase in such crimes, with the number of reported incidents increasing from 27 to 30. According to the-signal.com, the increase in hate crimes has come at the heels of a decrease in the number of violent and other more common crimes. Compared to other county areas, Santa Clarita’s hate crime numbers are still relatively low, although current numbers are more than twice what they were in 2004. From 2007 to 2008, the Santa Clarita Valley saw an 11% increase in hate crimes, according to the Los Angeles County Commission on Human Relations. Neighboring Los Angeles County meanwhile saw a 4% decrease in its number of hate crimes, although it still reported 729 hate crimes in 2008; a far cry from Santa Clarita County’s mere 30 incidents.

According to a Los Angeles County sheriff’s deputy, the number of hate crimes “is increasing every year.” Hate crimes mostly center-around sexual orientation, race, ethnicity, or religious beliefs. The degree and severity of a hate crime can vary greatly, with crimes ranging from simple acts of vandalism to more serious instances of assault. Consequently, charges associated with hate crimes can also vary. However, regardless of the crime, all details need to be thoroughly examined in order to determine as accurately as possible what actually happened.

Number of Sex Offenders Growing and Law Enforcement Can’t Keep Up

A CBS News report recently talked about the dilemma facing law enforcement agencies in regard to the ever increasing number of sex offenders. That is, with the number of registered sex offenders now teetering around 716,000, representative of a 78% increase since 2001 according to the National Center for Missing & Exploited Children, it is becoming more and more difficult for law enforcement to keep a watchful eye over parolees that still may represent a high risk at repeat offending. The article mentions one such offender, released from prison on parole, who in a matter of months was once again apprehended and charged with child molestation.

With such an influx of individuals being released into the general public, law enforcement is allegedly ill-prepared to effectively monitor them all. This has led some to question whether or not offenders on parole are any different than individuals that simply haven’t been caught yet.

White-Collar Medicare Fraud Lands 20 in Custody

Instances of white-collar crime involving Medicare have resulted in the indictment of 331 people across the country since March of 2007. According to the Associated Press, 20 people have recently been charged with filing fraudulent Medicare claims that amounted to the astronomical amount of $26 million. Reportedly, the fraudulent claims took the form of billing for pricey medical equipment that was not required to help any individual with his or her rehabilitation. In some instances, Medicare was billed for equipment that was never received, and in some cases billed for equipment that was supposedly purchased by individuals who were no longer even alive.

Medicare fraud is a problem that has plagued the health care industry for some time, costing the nation an estimated $60 billion each year. What makes many of these cases different though is the involvement local gangs have taken on as of late. That is, according to the article, one individual was accused of recruiting relatives and individuals linked to a Southern California gang to act as owners for fraudulent medical equipment companies. Furthermore, gang involvement has also resulted in acts of violence being enacted against individuals, typically to settle debts owed stemming from the funds collected on behalf of the fraudulent activity.

White-collar crime in Los Angeles is often non-violent, and involves either the theft of intellectual property, embezzlement of some kind, or defrauding a person or group out of money or services. White-collar crime can carry with it significant monetary fines, jail time, and can ultimately affect an individual’s ability to secure gainful employment even years after the alleged offense took place. In all instances where an individual is accused of crime, a white-collar defense attorney should be immediately retained in order to provide the accused with the strongest possible defense that their case warrants.

Covina Police Investigate Suspected Sexual Assault of Teenage Boy

Los Angeles local ABC affiliate KABC-TV, channel 7, reported that Covina police recently arrested a 47-year-old man on suspicion of child molestation. According to the report, the man has been accused of sexually assaulting a 14-year-old boy that he met on the popular social networking site, MySpace. Supposedly, the man and teenager arranged a real life meeting with each other, and the incident of sexual assault took place at that meeting. While police continue to investigate this case, they are still looking for other possible victims that the man may have had similar interactions with.

In many sex crimes, physical evidence of wrongdoing may not necessarily be available, particularly if parties involved consented to the behavior and action in question. The news report did not mention whether or not investigators had any sort of evidence against the 47-year-old man, other than the testimony of the 14-year-old boy. Though a thorough investigation will undoubtedly reveal more details of the case, the man is innocent until proven guilty.

The social stigma associated with sex crimes can sometimes be more damaging in the long run than even the punishments handed down by a court of law. Not only will a convicted sex offender have to serve jail time, but he or she may also need to register as sex offender. Such registry can make it particularly difficult for an individual to find a place to live and secure gainful employment.

Lil Wayne Pleads Guilty to Automatic Weapon Charge

The entertainer known as Lil Wayne has pled guilty to second-degree attempted weapon possession, a felony. According to a news story, the 27-year-old rapper’s tour bus was pulled over in New York in July of 2007. Reportedly, law enforcement witnessed marijuana smoke emanating from the vehicle, and found a loaded semi-automatic weapon upon searching the bus. Reportedly, the 27-year-old is expected to receive a one-year jail sentence. He also faces charges in the state of Arizona for felony drug possession and weapons charges.

Defense attorneys on the case argue that there was no basis for searching the bus, and that more than a dozen other people were on the bus at the time it was stopped by law enforcement. Reportedly, small amounts of DNA evidence belonging to the 27-year-old were found on the weapon, which the defense argues does not belong to the rapper. Furthermore, defense counsel argues that the method in which DNA was tested for was too problematic to prove who the weapon belonged to.

Polanski May Have to Finish What the D.A. Started

According to the Los Angeles Times, film director Roman Polanski will be extradited to the United States so that he may face child-sex charges dating back to 1978. Polanksi is currently being held by Swiss officials, and is fighting the extradition. Based on correspondence sent between the two countries, extradition seems likely at this point. Reportedly, U.S. officials were tipped off by the Swiss federal office of justice that Polanski would be entering Switzerland to attend the Zurich film festival. He was then arrested as he stepped off an airplane at a Swiss airport.

In 1978, Polanski was accused of committing sexual acts with a then 13-year-old girl. Though the now grown-up 13-year-old does not wish to pursue criminal charges against Polanski, and would simply prefer it if the matter were put behind her entirely, U.S. officials have been trying to somehow get Polanski back in the country for years.

Sex charges of all kinds are a serious matter. Often times, sex offenses can be characterized by he-said, she-said accusations. Polanski’s defense attorney argues even now that improper conversations took place between the presiding judge and prosecution. In any event, it is important that all cases pertaining to sex crimes are properly handled, and that those who stand accused are given every opportunity to properly defend themselves in a court of law.

Parents Killing Children is an Alarming Trend

A recent story put out by the Associated Press tells of a startling trend pertaining to homicides involving children. In Los Angeles, a woman stands accused of killing her two daughters, ages 11 and 17. In Orange County, a 5-year-old and a 3-year-old were allegedly wounded by their mother. And in Ventura County, a 12-year-old boy and his 7-year-old sister were stabbed to death allegedly by their father. In all of these cases, the serious question as to why parents are supposedly willing to hurt their children needs to be asked, and the circumstances surrounding the slayings and injuries need to be thoroughly examined to determine what exactly happened.

The Los Angeles woman has pleaded not guilty to the charges being brought against her, and faces the death penalty if she is convicted. The woman was found with self-inflicted knife wounds on her own arms. This raises the question as to what her state of mind was at the time of the incident. Did she act with a clear head or in a fit of insanity? Other questions, such as the state of the home, also need to be answered to help paint a vivid picture of what the living situation was truly like, and what negative factors, if any, could have played a detrimental role leading up to the attacks.

Year-to-Date, Crime Down 7.4% Overall

Although it was speculated that crime rates would rise in such a down-trodden economy, the level of crime actually dropped an average of 7.4%, according to year-to-date statistics that were released on September 5th. According to contracosttimes.com, auto theft plummeted 17.6% year-to-date and homicides dropped almost 15%. Overall, crime levels seem to be dropping or at the very least remaining stagnant, both signs that economic misfortune is not having an impact on the likelihood that an individual will resort to committing property crimes as a means of supporting oneself.

During tough times such as these, individuals are often left wondering where their next paycheck is going to come from. With unemployment as prevalent as it is, seeing a person out and about without much direction, particularly on a work day, is a more common sight with each passing week. Unfortunately, some people, in seeing these unemployed individuals out and about, might take it upon themselves to jump to conclusions by attributing possible guilt to these out-of-work individuals simply because they happened to be in the wrong place at the wrong time.

While instances of crime are down according to statistics, instances of false accusation aren’t necessarily affected, positively or negatively, by the poor economic climate. However, with more and more people becoming unemployed everyday, the likelihood of more individuals being accused of some form of wrong doing undoubtedly rises. In the event that a person is falsely accused of a crime, regardless of severity, it is crucial that anexperienced Los Angeles criminal defense lawyer is immediately contacted to help combat supposed charges and clear one’s good name.

No Driving Until You Pass Your Breath Test

According to a story from the Los Angeles Times, California drunk drivers that have been convicted of DUI may have to take a Breathalyzer test every time they want to drive their cars. That is, a bill proposes a new program that would place ignition-locking breath analysis systems into the automobiles of those individuals that have been convicted of driving while under the influence. Such a device would force motorists to have to pass a blood alcohol concentration test before their cars are permitted to start. The bill is currently awaiting approval from Governor Schwarzenegger, and is set to run in Los Angeles, Alameda, Sacramento, and Tulare counties.

According to the bill, the ignition-locking systems would take the place of a convicted motorist’s restricted license. Furthermore, it would be expected of motorists to pay for the installation of the devices and it creates the interesting question as to how law enforcement and probation officers would be able to enforce such a program. Ultimately, there are numerous issues that could arise that would prove the program to be relatively ineffective in curbing driving while under the influence.

For starters, a restricted license is very different than an automobile that does not start unless a breath test is passed. That is, while a restricted license will follow convicted motorists around from vehicle to vehicle, the Breathalyzer will not. All one would need to do to essentially circumvent the system would be to use another person’s car instead of their own, which begs the question as to how exactly a program such as this would prove to be successful.

Prison Pop Cut Could Mean More Arrests

It was recently reported on cbsnews.com that a panel of federal judges has decreed that the state of California must reduce its prison population by as much as 40,000 inmates, all in hopes of alleviating overcrowded prisons and improving the time and attention allowed for inmate health care. The current population of about 150,000 would be cut down to about 110,000, and a plan for doing so must be made by the state of California within a time period of 45 days.

An article in the Los Angeles Times article recently stated that “the governor and most legislative leaders back a plan that would reduce prison populations by as many as 37,000 over the next two years using a combination of early releases, changes in parole policies and shifting some prisoners to county jails.” While this idea seems relatively sound, it has received backlash from law enforcement and victim’s rights groups, who believe that putting convicted prisoners back on the streets could pose a risk to the well-being of California’s general population.

Furthermore, in putting pervious offenders back on the streets, in can be assumed that law enforcement officials opposed to the idea may profile these recently released inmates, or simply become much stricter in their practice of arresting individuals for committing crimes.